Fragmentation and rival armed blocs
Haftar's Operation Dignity in the east and heavy fighting in western Libya hardened the split between rival authorities, armed coalitions, and regional patrons.
Conflict archive
A factional war in Libya shaped by foreign-backed airpower, drones, air defense systems, armor, and proxy forces.
Libya's 2014-2020 civil war developed from rival post-revolutionary institutions into a foreign-backed contest between the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord and Khalifa Haftar's Libyan National Army. The war was fought across eastern Libya, the western coastal belt, Tripoli, and the Sirte-Jufra corridor, with the 2019-2020 Tripoli campaign turning into a test case for drones, air defense systems, foreign fighters, and embargo-violating resupply networks.
This archive focuses on systems documented in the 2014-2020 Libyan Civil War between the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord and Khalifa Haftar's Libyan National Army.
The conflict is especially relevant for comparing foreign-supplied drones, air defense, aircraft, armor, and fire-support systems used around Tripoli and other contested areas.
13 weapon systemsContext
This archive should be read as a focused sample of a wider equipment ecosystem. The connected Bayraktar TB2 entry reflects the GNA side of a conflict in which UAVs, air defense systems, electronic warfare, artillery, armor, aircraft, logistics hubs, and foreign resupply routes shaped the 2019-2020 Tripoli campaign. Public sourcing is uneven: UN and research-institute reports document broad patterns of embargo violations and foreign support, while individual weapon claims often depend on verified imagery, battlefield reporting, or sanctions-investigation detail.
Map
Map data from OpenStreetMap contributors.
Timeline
Khalifa Haftar launched Operation Dignity from eastern Libya, helping turn Libya's post-2011 institutional crisis into an armed struggle between rival military-political blocs.
Sources: Washington Institute Haftar Profile, OHCHR Libya Report
UN-facilitated talks at Skhirat produced the Libyan Political Agreement, which the Security Council welcomed as the framework for a Government of National Accord.
Sources: UN Security Council Resolution 2259
Haftar's LNA moved against western Libya and Tripoli, disrupting UN peace efforts and starting the campaign that dominates the archive's 2019-2020 equipment record.
Sources: CFR Libya Global Conflict Tracker, Security Council Report January 2020 Libya Forecast
International participants met in Berlin and backed a UN-led process, including arms-embargo commitments, a 5+5 military track, and a renewed push for a lasting ceasefire.
Sources: UN Security Council Repertoire 2020 Libya, UNSCR Resolution 2510 Summary
With Turkish support and armed UAV operations, GNA-aligned forces retook al-Watiya air base, a major LNA logistics and operations hub in western Libya.
Sources: Al Jazeera Airpower Saved Tripoli
GNA-aligned forces entered Tarhuna after the LNA withdrew from its remaining Tripoli positions, ending Haftar's 14-month attempt to take the capital.
Sources: Al Jazeera Tarhuna Report, CFR Libya Global Conflict Tracker
The 5+5 Joint Military Commission signed a permanent countrywide ceasefire under UN facilitation, creating the formal endpoint used for this conflict archive.
Sources: Al Jazeera Ceasefire Report, UNSMIL Ceasefire Agreement
Phases
Haftar's Operation Dignity in the east and heavy fighting in western Libya hardened the split between rival authorities, armed coalitions, and regional patrons.
The Libyan Political Agreement created the GNA framework, but rival institutions, militias, and external backers prevented a consolidated national security structure.
The LNA offensive against Tripoli shifted the conflict toward siege warfare, precision airstrikes, UAV reconnaissance and strike missions, and intensified foreign resupply.
After the Berlin process began, battlefield support continued to flow; Turkish-backed GNA operations and LNA air-defense losses reversed the Tripoli campaign.
The front stabilized around central Libya after the LNA withdrawal from western Libya, leading to UN-facilitated 5+5 military talks and the October ceasefire.
External Support
The war became heavily internationalized. Reporting and UN-linked sanctions material describe Turkey and Qatar backing the Tripoli government, while the UAE, Egypt, Russia, Jordan, and Wagner-linked forces supported or enabled the LNA side. External support included UAVs, air-defense systems, electronic warfare equipment, armored vehicles, aircraft, artillery, foreign fighters, mercenaries, air bridges, and maritime shipments despite the UN arms embargo.
Images
.png?width=720)
Category
Crewed aircraft, drones, and loitering munitions.
Bayraktar TB2Medium-altitude long-endurance UAVSide: Government of National AccordRole: Armed UAV strike and close air supportBuilt: Baykar / TurkeyA Turkish unmanned aircraft used for reconnaissance and strike missions. It became especially prominent in the early phase of the full-scale invasion.
Su-24Supersonic all-weather tactical bomber and strike aircraftSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Close air support and offensive firesBuilt: Sukhoi / Soviet Union / RussiaThe Su-24, NATO reporting name Fencer, is a Soviet-designed twin-engine tactical bomber built for low-level all-weather strike missions. In Ukrainian service during the Russia-Ukraine War, surviving Su-24M and Su-24MR aircraft became especially important after integration of Storm Shadow and SCALP-EG cruise missiles, allowing long-range attacks without relying on newer Western combat aircraft.Category
Systems that contest aircraft, missiles, helicopters, and drones.
Pantsir-S1Self-propelled short-range surface-to-air missile and anti-aircraft gun systemSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Short-range air defenseBuilt: KBP Instrument Design Bureau / RussiaThe Pantsir-S1 is a Russian mobile point-defense system that combines command-guided surface-to-air missiles, twin 30 mm automatic cannon, radar tracking, and electro-optical fire control on a wheeled combat vehicle. It is intended to defend military units, air-defense sites, and infrastructure from aircraft, helicopters, cruise missiles, precision weapons, and UAVs, and has been documented in Russian service during the Russia-Ukraine War with some systems captured and reused by Ukraine.Category
Troop carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, and protected mobility.
Category
Portable weapons used by soldiers and small units.
TM-62Anti-tank blast mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli mine warfare and booby-trap contaminationBuilt: Various Soviet and Russian state manufacturers / Soviet Union / RussiaThe TM-62 is a Soviet family of circular anti-tank blast mines built around a central fuze and a large high-explosive charge. The metal-cased TM-62M and plastic-cased TM-62P3 variants are documented in the Russia-Ukraine War, where both sides have used anti-vehicle mines extensively to block routes, defend positions, and contaminate farmland and approaches.
PMN-1/2/4Antipersonnel blast mine familySide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Antipersonnel area denialBuilt: Soviet and Russian state munitions plants / Soviet Union / RussiaThe PMN-1/2/4 family covers Soviet and Russian pressure-activated antipersonnel blast mines used to deny foot movement and injure personnel at close range. PMN-1 and PMN-2 are Soviet designs, while PMN-4 is a later Russian circular plastic-cased mine; all three are relevant to mine-contamination reporting in and around Ukraine, where PMN-2 and PMN-4 examples have been documented during the Russia-Ukraine War.
OZM-72Bounding antipersonnel fragmentation mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Antipersonnel mine warfareBuilt: Factory 583 / Soviet state arsenals / Soviet Union / RussiaThe OZM-72 is a Soviet-designed bounding antipersonnel fragmentation mine that ejects from its casing before detonation, projecting fragments around the burst point. In the Russia-Ukraine War, Human Rights Watch has documented OZM-72 mines among Russian antipersonnel mine use, making the system part of Ukraine's wider explosive-ordnance clearance problem in retaken areas.
MON-100Directional anti-personnel fragmentation mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli mine warfare and booby trapsBuilt: Soviet and Russian state arsenals, exact plant not identified in open sources / USSR and RussiaThe MON-100 is a Soviet/Russian directional anti-personnel fragmentation mine, a larger member of the MON family intended to project steel fragments across a 100-meter danger area. In the Russia-Ukraine War it appears in mine-action reporting as one of the MON-series mines used by Russian forces, adding to the hand-emplaced and tripwire or command-initiated explosive hazards facing Ukrainian deminers and civilians.
MON-50Directional fragmentation antipersonnel mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli antipersonnel mine emplacementBuilt: Soviet/Russian defense industry / Soviet Union / Russia / BulgariaThe MON-50 is a Soviet directional fragmentation antipersonnel mine broadly comparable in role to the M18 Claymore, with a plastic body, folding legs, and a forward fragmentation pattern. It can be command-detonated or configured with tripwire and other fuzing, making it a compact infantry obstacle and ambush munition. In the Russia-Ukraine War, monitoring groups identify MON-50 mines among Russian-used hand-emplaced antipersonnel mines, adding to the dense explosive contamination faced by Ukrainian deminers and civilians.
POM-2Scatterable antipersonnel fragmentation mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli mine warfare and area denialBuilt: Soviet/Russian state munitions industry / Soviet Union / RussiaThe POM-2 is a Soviet/Russian scatterable antipersonnel fragmentation mine that deploys tripwire sensors after delivery by rockets, helicopters, aircraft, vehicles, or specialized dispensers. In Ukraine and Libya, it appears in documented Russian-linked mine warfare, including POM-2 mines and KPOM-2 canisters recovered by Ukrainian emergency services and POM-2/POM-2R mines reported around Tripoli.Category
Heavy armor built around direct fire, protection, and battlefield shock.
T-62Main battle tankSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Armored direct fire supportBuilt: Uralvagonzavod / Soviet UnionThe T-62 is a Soviet main battle tank built around a 115 mm smoothbore gun, a four-person crew, and conventional tracked armor layout. Designed by the Uralvagonzavod design bureau as a successor to the T-54/T-55 family, it became a major Cold War Soviet tank and later reappeared in Russia's war against Ukraine as older T-62M and T-62MV variants were pulled from storage to supplement Russian armored forces.Conflict Sources
UN and research-institute sources are strongest for political milestones, embargo patterns, and broad equipment categories. Individual battlefield equipment claims in Libya often rely on open-source imagery, partisan reporting, or sanctions investigations, so this conflict page keeps weapon-specific statements limited to systems directly sourced in catalog entries.