Conflict archive

Libyan Civil War (2014-2020) Weapons and Equipment

A factional war in Libya shaped by foreign-backed airpower, drones, air defense systems, armor, and proxy forces.

Libya's 2014-2020 civil war developed from rival post-revolutionary institutions into a foreign-backed contest between the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord and Khalifa Haftar's Libyan National Army. The war was fought across eastern Libya, the western coastal belt, Tripoli, and the Sirte-Jufra corridor, with the 2019-2020 Tripoli campaign turning into a test case for drones, air defense systems, foreign fighters, and embargo-violating resupply networks.

This archive focuses on systems documented in the 2014-2020 Libyan Civil War between the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord and Khalifa Haftar's Libyan National Army.

The conflict is especially relevant for comparing foreign-supplied drones, air defense, aircraft, armor, and fire-support systems used around Tripoli and other contested areas.

13 weapon systems

Context

Status
Published archive
Location
Libya, centered on the Tripoli front and Sirte-Jufra corridor
Countries
Libya
Regions
Tripoli, Western Libya, Sirte-Jufra corridor, Benghazi and eastern Libya
Domains
land, air, maritime, missile strikes, UAV, air defense, electronic warfare, border clashes

This archive should be read as a focused sample of a wider equipment ecosystem. The connected Bayraktar TB2 entry reflects the GNA side of a conflict in which UAVs, air defense systems, electronic warfare, artillery, armor, aircraft, logistics hubs, and foreign resupply routes shaped the 2019-2020 Tripoli campaign. Public sourcing is uneven: UN and research-institute reports document broad patterns of embargo violations and foreign support, while individual weapon claims often depend on verified imagery, battlefield reporting, or sanctions-investigation detail.

Map

Libya, centered on the Tripoli front and Sirte-Jufra corridor

Open map

Map data from OpenStreetMap contributors.

Timeline

Key Events

  1. Operation Dignity begins

    Khalifa Haftar launched Operation Dignity from eastern Libya, helping turn Libya's post-2011 institutional crisis into an armed struggle between rival military-political blocs.

    Sources: Washington Institute Haftar Profile, OHCHR Libya Report

  2. Libyan Political Agreement signed

    UN-facilitated talks at Skhirat produced the Libyan Political Agreement, which the Security Council welcomed as the framework for a Government of National Accord.

    Sources: UN Security Council Resolution 2259

  3. LNA offensive targets Tripoli

    Haftar's LNA moved against western Libya and Tripoli, disrupting UN peace efforts and starting the campaign that dominates the archive's 2019-2020 equipment record.

    Sources: CFR Libya Global Conflict Tracker, Security Council Report January 2020 Libya Forecast

  4. Berlin Conference sets a diplomatic framework

    International participants met in Berlin and backed a UN-led process, including arms-embargo commitments, a 5+5 military track, and a renewed push for a lasting ceasefire.

    Sources: UN Security Council Repertoire 2020 Libya, UNSCR Resolution 2510 Summary

  5. GNA retakes al-Watiya air base

    With Turkish support and armed UAV operations, GNA-aligned forces retook al-Watiya air base, a major LNA logistics and operations hub in western Libya.

    Sources: Al Jazeera Airpower Saved Tripoli

  6. Tarhuna falls after the Tripoli siege collapses

    GNA-aligned forces entered Tarhuna after the LNA withdrew from its remaining Tripoli positions, ending Haftar's 14-month attempt to take the capital.

    Sources: Al Jazeera Tarhuna Report, CFR Libya Global Conflict Tracker

  7. Permanent ceasefire signed in Geneva

    The 5+5 Joint Military Commission signed a permanent countrywide ceasefire under UN facilitation, creating the formal endpoint used for this conflict archive.

    Sources: Al Jazeera Ceasefire Report, UNSMIL Ceasefire Agreement

Phases

May 16, 2014 - Dec 17, 2015

Fragmentation and rival armed blocs

Haftar's Operation Dignity in the east and heavy fighting in western Libya hardened the split between rival authorities, armed coalitions, and regional patrons.

Dec 17, 2015 - Apr 4, 2019

UN-backed GNA and unresolved dual power

The Libyan Political Agreement created the GNA framework, but rival institutions, militias, and external backers prevented a consolidated national security structure.

Apr 4, 2019 - Jan 19, 2020

Tripoli offensive and air war escalation

The LNA offensive against Tripoli shifted the conflict toward siege warfare, precision airstrikes, UAV reconnaissance and strike missions, and intensified foreign resupply.

Jan 19, 2020 - Jun 5, 2020

Foreign-backed counteroffensive

After the Berlin process began, battlefield support continued to flow; Turkish-backed GNA operations and LNA air-defense losses reversed the Tripoli campaign.

Jun 5, 2020 - Oct 23, 2020

Sirte-Jufra standoff and ceasefire

The front stabilized around central Libya after the LNA withdrawal from western Libya, leading to UN-facilitated 5+5 military talks and the October ceasefire.

External Support

The war became heavily internationalized. Reporting and UN-linked sanctions material describe Turkey and Qatar backing the Tripoli government, while the UAE, Egypt, Russia, Jordan, and Wagner-linked forces supported or enabled the LNA side. External support included UAVs, air-defense systems, electronic warfare equipment, armored vehicles, aircraft, artillery, foreign fighters, mercenaries, air bridges, and maritime shipments despite the UN arms embargo.

Images

Map of the 2019-2020 western Libya operation showing LNA and GNA areas of control
Wikimedia Commons map of the western Libya operation during the 2019-2020 Tripoli campaign.Rr016 and OpenStreetMap contributors via Wikimedia Commons | CC BY-SA 4.0 / CC BY-SA 2.0 map data attribution
Map of Libyan Civil War areas of control
Wikimedia Commons overview map showing Libyan Civil War areas of control.Beshogur and Wikimedia Commons contributors | CC BY-SA 4.0

Category

Aircraft & UAVs

Crewed aircraft, drones, and loitering munitions.

2

Category

Air Defense

Systems that contest aircraft, missiles, helicopters, and drones.

2

Category

Armored Vehicles

Troop carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, and protected mobility.

1

Category

Infantry Weapons

Portable weapons used by soldiers and small units.

6
TM-62, Anti-tank blast mine, Infantry WeaponsInfantry WeaponsTM-62Anti-tank blast mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli mine warfare and booby-trap contaminationBuilt: Various Soviet and Russian state manufacturers / Soviet Union / RussiaThe TM-62 is a Soviet family of circular anti-tank blast mines built around a central fuze and a large high-explosive charge. The metal-cased TM-62M and plastic-cased TM-62P3 variants are documented in the Russia-Ukraine War, where both sides have used anti-vehicle mines extensively to block routes, defend positions, and contaminate farmland and approaches.
PMN-1/2/4, Antipersonnel blast mine family, Infantry WeaponsInfantry WeaponsPMN-1/2/4Antipersonnel blast mine familySide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Antipersonnel area denialBuilt: Soviet and Russian state munitions plants / Soviet Union / RussiaThe PMN-1/2/4 family covers Soviet and Russian pressure-activated antipersonnel blast mines used to deny foot movement and injure personnel at close range. PMN-1 and PMN-2 are Soviet designs, while PMN-4 is a later Russian circular plastic-cased mine; all three are relevant to mine-contamination reporting in and around Ukraine, where PMN-2 and PMN-4 examples have been documented during the Russia-Ukraine War.
OZM-72, Bounding antipersonnel fragmentation mine, Infantry WeaponsInfantry WeaponsOZM-72Bounding antipersonnel fragmentation mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Antipersonnel mine warfareBuilt: Factory 583 / Soviet state arsenals / Soviet Union / RussiaThe OZM-72 is a Soviet-designed bounding antipersonnel fragmentation mine that ejects from its casing before detonation, projecting fragments around the burst point. In the Russia-Ukraine War, Human Rights Watch has documented OZM-72 mines among Russian antipersonnel mine use, making the system part of Ukraine's wider explosive-ordnance clearance problem in retaken areas.
MON-100, Directional anti-personnel fragmentation mine, Infantry WeaponsInfantry WeaponsMON-100Directional anti-personnel fragmentation mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli mine warfare and booby trapsBuilt: Soviet and Russian state arsenals, exact plant not identified in open sources / USSR and RussiaThe MON-100 is a Soviet/Russian directional anti-personnel fragmentation mine, a larger member of the MON family intended to project steel fragments across a 100-meter danger area. In the Russia-Ukraine War it appears in mine-action reporting as one of the MON-series mines used by Russian forces, adding to the hand-emplaced and tripwire or command-initiated explosive hazards facing Ukrainian deminers and civilians.
MON-50, Directional fragmentation antipersonnel mine, Infantry WeaponsInfantry WeaponsMON-50Directional fragmentation antipersonnel mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli antipersonnel mine emplacementBuilt: Soviet/Russian defense industry / Soviet Union / Russia / BulgariaThe MON-50 is a Soviet directional fragmentation antipersonnel mine broadly comparable in role to the M18 Claymore, with a plastic body, folding legs, and a forward fragmentation pattern. It can be command-detonated or configured with tripwire and other fuzing, making it a compact infantry obstacle and ambush munition. In the Russia-Ukraine War, monitoring groups identify MON-50 mines among Russian-used hand-emplaced antipersonnel mines, adding to the dense explosive contamination faced by Ukrainian deminers and civilians.
POM-2, Scatterable antipersonnel fragmentation mine, Infantry WeaponsInfantry WeaponsPOM-2Scatterable antipersonnel fragmentation mineSide: Libyan National ArmyRole: Tripoli mine warfare and area denialBuilt: Soviet/Russian state munitions industry / Soviet Union / RussiaThe POM-2 is a Soviet/Russian scatterable antipersonnel fragmentation mine that deploys tripwire sensors after delivery by rockets, helicopters, aircraft, vehicles, or specialized dispensers. In Ukraine and Libya, it appears in documented Russian-linked mine warfare, including POM-2 mines and KPOM-2 canisters recovered by Ukrainian emergency services and POM-2/POM-2R mines reported around Tripoli.

Category

Tanks

Heavy armor built around direct fire, protection, and battlefield shock.

2

Conflict Sources

UN and research-institute sources are strongest for political milestones, embargo patterns, and broad equipment categories. Individual battlefield equipment claims in Libya often rely on open-source imagery, partisan reporting, or sanctions investigations, so this conflict page keeps weapon-specific statements limited to systems directly sourced in catalog entries.

  • Washington Institute Haftar ProfilePublisher: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy | Note: Supports the May 2014 start of Operation Dignity and Haftar's eastern Libya military role. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • OHCHR Libya ReportPublisher: ICRC Casebook / OHCHR | Note: Supports early conflict background, including Operation Dignity in eastern Libya and fighting in western Libya. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • UN Security Council Resolution 2259Publisher: United Nations Security Council | Note: Supports the 17 December 2015 Libyan Political Agreement and the Government of National Accord framework. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • CFR Libya Global Conflict TrackerPublisher: Council on Foreign Relations | Note: Supports conflict overview, Tripoli offensive context, Turkish support, GNA June 2020 breakthrough, and ceasefire framing. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • Security Council Report January 2020 Libya ForecastPublisher: Security Council Report | Note: Supports the April 2019 LNA offensive against Tripoli and the stalled front before the Berlin process. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • UN Security Council Repertoire 2020 LibyaPublisher: United Nations Security Council | Note: Supports the Berlin Conference, Security Council resolution 2510, arms-embargo commitments, and the October 2020 ceasefire context. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • UNSCR Resolution 2510 SummaryPublisher: UNSCR | Note: Readable summary of Security Council resolution 2510 endorsing the Berlin Conference conclusions. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • Al Jazeera Airpower Saved TripoliPublisher: Al Jazeera | Note: Supports the UAV, air-defense, electronic-warfare, al-Watiya, Bayraktar TB2, Wing Loong, and Pantsir context in the Tripoli campaign. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • Al Jazeera Tarhuna ReportPublisher: Al Jazeera | Note: Supports the June 2020 fall of Tarhuna and collapse of the LNA's Tripoli offensive. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • Al Jazeera Ceasefire ReportPublisher: Al Jazeera | Note: Supports the 23 October 2020 permanent ceasefire signed through the 5+5 Joint Military Commission. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • UNSMIL Ceasefire AgreementPublisher: United Nations Support Mission in Libya | Note: Primary ceasefire agreement text for the 23 October 2020 endpoint. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • UN Libya Panel of Experts ReportsPublisher: United Nations Security Council | Note: Supports source trail for UN Panel of Experts reporting on sanctions and arms-embargo violations. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • AP Libya Embargo Violations ReportPublisher: The Washington Post / Associated Press | Note: Supports external-support summary on foreign backers, arms transfers, Wagner-linked support, and embargo-violation patterns. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • Africa Center Libya Geostrategic DimensionsPublisher: Africa Center for Strategic Studies | Note: Supports internationalization, airstrike, drone, air-defense, mercenary, and external-support context. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • New America Abu Dhabi ExpressPublisher: New America | Note: Supports Russia-UAE-Wagner, Pantsir, Turkish drone, and Tripoli campaign sourcing limits. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • Western Libya Operation MapPublisher: Wikimedia Commons | Note: Supports image provenance and license for the western Libya operation map. | Accessed: 2026-06-20
  • Libyan Civil War MapPublisher: Wikimedia Commons | Note: Supports image provenance and license for the Libyan Civil War overview map. | Accessed: 2026-06-20