
Vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (VBIED)
Represents the repeated use of vehicle bombs as assault, breach, and obstacle weapons in Iraq-Syria fighting.
Munitions / Vehicle-borne improvised explosive deviceConflict side
Islamic State and jihadist groups is a canonical conflict-side grouping for ISIS/ISIL core formations, recognized Islamic State provinces, and closely related jihadist armed actors documented in Iraq, Syria, Mozambique, and counter-ISIS campaign records.
53 weapon systemsIslamic State and jihadist groups covers a networked militant ecosystem rather than a single conventional force. The strongest source base concerns ISIS/ISIL in Iraq and Syria, where the organization emerged from al-Qaida in Iraq and the Islamic State of Iraq, expanded into Syria in 2013, seized major Iraqi and Syrian cities in 2014, declared a caliphate, and built a governing and military apparatus before losing its final territorial enclave at Baghouz, Syria, in March 2019.
The side profile also has to account for Islamic State provinces and associated jihadist groups whose command relationships, names, and evidentiary trails vary by theater. UN reporting, sanctions records, conflict-observer coding, and weapons investigations support a broad profile of insurgent infantry weapons, captured state equipment, improvised explosive devices, commercial-drone adaptation, and locally embedded supply networks, but they do not support treating every affiliate claim as direct central command.
The Iraq-Syria core combined insurgent methods with a period of territorial governance. CJTF-OIR describes ISIS as acquiring conventional weapons, forming sizeable armed formations, and taking control of large areas in Iraq and Syria after its 2013-2014 rise. Captured-document research by the Combating Terrorism Center shows that the organization also maintained bureaucratic systems for administration, security, payroll, and military organization, with the clearest documentary record coming from Iraq.
The post-caliphate phase shifted the public evidence base from territorial control to dispersed insurgency, detention-center risks, rural attack cells, and affiliates. UN Security Council reporting in 2026 described a multipolar threat, with Iraq and Syria still important to the core network while affiliates in West and Central Africa, the Sahel, and South Asia carried much of the operational momentum. Public assessments also differ on top-leadership identity, so leadership claims should be attributed rather than stated as settled fact.
Weapons documentation points to opportunistic acquisition and adaptation. Conflict Armament Research traced recovered Islamic State materiel in Iraq and Syria to captured or diverted state stocks, illicit supply chains, battlefield recovery, commercial components, and local manufacture. Later CAR work in the central Sahel found Salafi-jihadist groups drawing from the same local and predatory sources as other armed actors, including weapons diverted from state custody.
Conflict-local labels such as Islamic State, Islamic State Mozambique, and Islamic State and jihadist groups describe related but not identical formations. Shared grouping does not mean every listed formation had one uniform command structure, weapons pipeline, or operational doctrine.

Represents the repeated use of vehicle bombs as assault, breach, and obstacle weapons in Iraq-Syria fighting.
Munitions / Vehicle-borne improvised explosive device
Highlights the IED layer documented across Islamic State fighting, territorial defense, route denial, and post-battle contamination records.
Munitions / Improvised explosive device
Captures the adaptation of low-cost aerial systems for reconnaissance, targeting support, and munition delivery.
Aircraft & UAVs / Improvised military drone class
Represents the baseline infantry weapon family repeatedly documented in recovered Islamic State and jihadist-group stocks.
Infantry Weapons / Selective-fire assault rifle family
Shows the heavier direct-fire tier used from fixed positions, vehicles, and mobile fighting columns.
Infantry Weapons / 12.7 mm heavy machine gunISIS core descends from the Iraq-based jihadist network associated with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, al-Qaida in Iraq, and the Islamic State of Iraq. Congressional Research Service reporting traces the group's rebuilding under Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi after 2010, its expansion into Syria in 2013, its split from al-Qaida, and its June 2014 declaration of a caliphate with Baghdadi named as caliph. The claim was rejected by many Muslim scholars and rival jihadist actors, but it became central to the organization's recruitment, propaganda, and affiliate branding.
The 2014 Iraq-Syria territorial phase gave ISIS access to state arsenals, industrial areas, oil and taxation revenue, detention sites, and a captured urban base. CJTF-OIR says the group seized Mosul and Tikrit in June 2014, acquired conventional weapons, and built sizeable armed formations. Coalition and partner forces later retook the group's main territorial holdings; CENTCOM reported that by the end of the 2019 campaign more than 110,000 square kilometers and 7.7 million civilians had been liberated from ISIS control.
Captured-document research shows that ISIS was not merely a loose insurgent label during its Iraq territorial phase. CTC analysis identifies administrative, military, security, judicial, and finance structures, while cautioning that the surviving document set is uneven and strongest for Iraq. Later research on the General Directorate of Provinces describes a structure used to manage global provinces after territorial losses and repeated leadership attrition.
Affiliate and province labels require more caution than the Iraq-Syria core. CRS and CTC research show that ISIS accepted pledges and announced provinces outside Iraq and Syria, including in Libya, Sinai, Afghanistan, Yemen, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, and Nigeria, but the practical relationship between a local faction and ISIS core could range from propaganda alignment to stronger financial or managerial links. UN reporting in 2026 also noted differing Member State views on the identity of the overall ISIS leader, reinforcing the need to attribute leadership claims.
Conflict Armament Research's Iraq-Syria investigation analyzed more than 40,000 recovered items, including weapons, ammunition, IED components, and chemical precursors. Its findings support a supply picture based on captured and diverted state weapons, illicit market flows, battlefield recovery, commercial dual-use components, and local manufacturing rather than a single state-style procurement system.
Improvised weapons were a central part of the Iraq-Syria battlefield record. CAR traced components used in Islamic State IEDs and documented how commercial goods and supply-chain weaknesses fed improvised weapon programs. Documented systems in this grouping reflect that pattern through IEDs, VBIEDs, improvised drones, ammunition, AK-family rifles, DShK/DShKM heavy machine guns, mortars, artillery pieces, and captured vehicles.
Islamic State financing changed after the loss of territorial control. CTC analysis describes a move away from the peak caliphate revenue model toward cash reserves, local self-financing, extortion, illicit taxation, kidnapping, criminal facilitation, and affiliate-specific revenue streams. FATF's 2025 terrorist-financing update describes terrorists' continued use of cash couriers, money or value transfer services, bank accounts and frontmen where available, mobile money, crowdfunding, and virtual assets.
The international sanctions layer is broad. The UN ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida sanctions regime covers listed individuals, groups, undertakings, and entities, with measures including an assets freeze, travel ban, and arms embargo. Public sanctions material is useful for identifying designated networks and association criteria, but it rarely exposes the full intelligence record behind each listing.
The African affiliate picture is especially uneven. Islamic State Mozambique in Cabo Delgado, ISWAP and related Lake Chad factions, Islamic State Sahel Province, and ISCAP/ADF-linked activity all sit inside different local conflict economies. ACLED's Boko Haram and ISWAP methodology shows why naming matters: regional reporting may collapse separate factions into a single label, while Islamic State media channels may claim or imply affiliation in ways that do not settle command control.
Recent CAR work in the central Sahel found that Salafi-jihadist groups do not rely on unique arms sources; instead, they draw from local predatory acquisition, battlefield capture, diversion from state custody, and wider trafficking environments. UNODC and ISS/ENACT reporting on Sahel firearms trafficking similarly points to porous borders, conflict spillover, and tri-border trade corridors as conditions that shape how armed groups obtain small arms and ammunition.
The Iraq-based Islamic State organization expanded into Syria and adopted the ISIS/ISIL naming framework, setting up the later split with al-Qaida.
ISIS seized Mosul during its rapid 2014 Iraq offensive, gaining territory, materiel, and international attention.
ISIS declared a caliphate and named Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as caliph, a claim rejected by many Muslim scholars and rival jihadists.
Iraq announced victory over ISIS territorial control after the loss of the group's major Iraqi holdings.
U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces announced the capture of Baghouz, ending ISIS's last physical territorial enclave in Syria.
UN reporting described ISIS and al-Qaida threats as dispersed across core areas and affiliates, with strong activity outside the original Iraq-Syria theater.
Islamic State media claims, province names, and sanctions listings can support association or declared allegiance, but they do not always prove that ISIS core planned, directed, funded, or supplied a specific local attack.
Evidence quality varies sharply by theater. Iraq-Syria claims are supported by coalition records, captured documents, and arms-tracing investigations; affiliate claims often rely on UN reporting, sanctions records, propaganda-attribution caveats, and conflict-observer coding that may support association without proving centralized command.
Category
Crewed aircraft, drones, and loitering munitions.


Category
Systems that contest aircraft, missiles, helicopters, and drones.


Category
Troop carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, and protected mobility.



Category
Tube artillery, rocket artillery, and long-range ground fires.





Category
Portable weapons used by soldiers and small units.



























Category
Standalone missiles, bombs, rockets, torpedoes, and guided or unguided explosive payloads.












Category
Transport, logistics, recovery, command, engineering, and other enabling equipment.
Category
Heavy armor built around direct fire, protection, and battlefield shock.