In the 2014 Russia-Ukraine War, Human Rights Watch documented widespread Russian antipersonnel and anti-vehicle mine use after the February 2022 full-scale invasion and separately reported apparent Ukrainian rocket-delivered PFM-series mine use around Izium.
Role detailsLandmine
- mine
- anti-personnel mine
- antipersonnel mine
- anti-vehicle mine
- anti-tank mine
- improvised mine
- scatterable mine
- remote mine
Landmines are ground-emplaced explosive munitions triggered by a person's or vehicle's presence, proximity, or contact, with battlefield roles ranging from route denial and obstacle protection to remote minefield laying. This class page covers conventional anti-personnel and anti-vehicle mines, scatterable mines, directional fragmentation mines, and improvised victim-activated mines where sources directly document conflict use.
Role in Conflicts
In the 2023 Israel-Hamas War, RUSI described Hamas laying mines along roads in Gaza, with some devices surface-laid and easier to detect or remove than buried mines; Mine Action Review later reported continued landmine incidents in Gaza.
Role detailsIn the 2014 Yemen Civil War, Human Rights Watch reported Houthi forces' widespread landmine use along Yemen's western coast since mid-2017, including antipersonnel mines and indiscriminate anti-vehicle mine use that harmed civilians and restricted aid access.
Role detailsIn the Libyan Civil War, Human Rights Watch and Landmine Monitor documented landmines, improvised explosive devices, and booby traps left around Tripoli after Hiftar-aligned forces and Russian mercenaries withdrew in 2020.
In the 1984 Kurdish-Turkish Conflict, Turkish defense-ministry reporting said security forces defused DM-11 anti-personnel landmines that the PKK had planted on a roadside in Sirnak province in 2020.
In the 2012 Mali War, mine-action reporting describes improvised anti-vehicle mines planted by JNIM and other armed groups against MINUSMA peacekeepers, Malian forces, and civilians, especially in central and northern regions.
During the 2025 Thailand-Cambodia Border Conflict, landmine blasts injured Thai soldiers along the border; Thailand accused Cambodia of laying new mines, while Cambodia denied new emplacement and attributed the danger to old uncleared mines.
In the 2001 War in Afghanistan, UNAMA and Landmine Monitor reporting treated Taliban and other armed-group pressure-plate IEDs as victim-activated improvised anti-personnel mines used during the insurgency.
Role detailsProfile / Specs
Profile
- Origin
- Multiple countries
- Built by
- Various manufacturers
- Built in
- Multiple
- Type
- Explosive ground mine
- Service note
- Modern and legacy use
- Designer
- Multiple state arsenals and non-state bomb makers
- Designed
- Varies by model
- Produced
- Varies by conventional, scatterable, and improvised mine type
Specifications
- Placement
- Designed to be placed under, on, or near the ground or another surface area
- Initiation
- Detonated by presence, proximity, contact, or command action depending on mine type and fuzing
- Effects
- Blast, fragmentation, mobility kill, injury, or route denial depending on design and target
- Common categories
- Anti-personnel, anti-vehicle, directional fragmentation, scatterable, surface-laid, and improvised mines
- Delivery methods
- Hand emplacement, vehicle or dispenser laying, rocket or artillery scattering, aircraft delivery, and improvised placement are all documented in public sources
Mine Types And Employment
The landmine category is broad, so the most useful distinction is usually target, initiation, and delivery method rather than a single manufacturer.
| Type | How it functions | Documented catalog context |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-personnel | Victim-activated mines triggered by a person's presence, proximity, or contact. | The treaty definition shapes how monitors classify conventional mines and victim-activated improvised mines. |
| Anti-vehicle | Designed for vehicles or armor; battlefield records often call them anti-tank mines. | Ukraine reporting distinguishes anti-vehicle mines from antipersonnel mines while documenting both in current use. |
| Surface-laid | Placed on or near the surface rather than deeply buried. | ![]() |
| Scatterable or remotely delivered | Dispersed by rockets, aircraft, vehicles, or other delivery systems instead of individual hand emplacement. | Linked examples include ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Improvised | Victim-activated improvised explosive devices that function as mines. | Afghanistan and Mali rows use mine-action reporting where pressure-plate IEDs or improvised anti-vehicle mines are treated as mine warfare. |
Sources: UN Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention; The Impact of Improvised Mines; Landmine Use in Ukraine; RUSI Tactical Lessons from IDF Operations in Gaza, 2023.
Variants
This class page groups mine types by target, initiation, and delivery method; linked rows point to cataloged examples or narrower mine-family pages.
| Variant | Configuration | Designation notes |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Surface or near-surface obstacle mine | RUSI and Mine Action Review describe surface-laid mine use in Gaza, making the linked record a narrower placement-focused page. Sources: RUSI Tactical Lessons from IDF Operations in Gaza, 2023, Mine Action Review Palestine 2025 |
![]() | Directional fragmentation antipersonnel mine | Human Rights Watch lists MON-series mines among Russian antipersonnel mines documented in Ukraine. Sources: Landmine Use in Ukraine |
![]() | Scatterable antipersonnel fragmentation mine | Human Rights Watch documented POM-2 mines and KPOM-2 dispensers recovered in Ukraine during the full-scale war. |
![]() | Scatterable antipersonnel blast mine | Human Rights Watch reported PFM-series mine use around Izium and tied the mines to 9M27K3 Uragan rocket delivery. |
![]() | Scatterable anti-vehicle mine | Human Rights Watch documented PTM-1/PTM-1G remotely delivered anti-vehicle mines in Kharkiv and Donetsk regions. |
Remote Mine Delivery Munitions
Several cataloged rockets are not mines themselves, but their source-backed role is to scatter mine payloads at range.
| Compatible item | Item type | Compatibility evidence |
|---|---|---|
![]() | 220 mm anti-tank mine cargo rocket | Armament Research Services lists the 9M27K2 Uragan cargo rocket as carrying 24 PTM-series anti-tank mines for remote minefield laying. |
![]() | 220 mm anti-personnel mine cargo rocket | Armament Research Services identifies the 9M27K3 as the Uragan cargo rocket carrying 312 PFM anti-personnel mines. |
![]() | 300 mm anti-tank mine cargo rocket | Rosoboronexport lists the 9M55K4 Smerch rocket as a remote anti-tank minefield round carrying 25 anti-tank mines. |
Timeline
Landmine Key Events
Mine Ban Convention adopted
The Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention established the core treaty definition used to distinguish victim-activated anti-personnel mines from other mine and command-detonated systems.
Sources: UN Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention
HRW reports Houthi mine use along Yemen's western coast
Human Rights Watch reported that Houthi forces had used landmines widely along Yemen's western coast since mid-2017, harming civilians and blocking aid access.
Sources: Yemen: Houthi Landmines Kill Civilians, Block Aid
Full-scale Ukraine invasion brings large-scale mine contamination
Human Rights Watch surveyed antipersonnel and anti-vehicle mines used in Ukraine after Russia's full-scale invasion began, including Russian mine use and apparent Ukrainian PFM-series mine use.
Sources: Landmine Use in Ukraine, Background Briefing on Landmine Use in Ukraine
RUSI describes road-laid mines in Gaza
RUSI described Hamas laying mines along roads in Gaza and noted that some surface-laid mines were easier to detect and remove than buried devices.
Sources: RUSI Tactical Lessons from IDF Operations in Gaza, 2023
Mine Action Review reports Gaza mine incidents
Mine Action Review's Palestine review again described mine use in Gaza, including surface-laid mine context and a reported Gaza City landmine attack.
Sources: Mine Action Review Palestine 2025
Related Weapon Systems


















